Commit Graph

17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
wmantly 3790e8001a Add Unix/POSIX service accounts, distinct from LDAP bind-only ones
The Integrations page's Service Accounts (bind-only, organizationalRole)
don't cover the other real use case: an account something actually runs
as on a Linux host -- a media manager, a torrent client, Emby -- with a
real uidNumber/gidNumber that owns files, and a group other accounts
join for write access (e.g. a `stuff_manager` group granting write
rights to a media library). That needs a real posixAccount, which the
bind-only model can't be.

- New well-known group `app_sso_service_account`, seeded the same way as
  app_sso_admin/app_sso_invite/app_sso_oauth_admin (docker-entrypoint.sh,
  ops/ldap-setup.sh). Not a permission gate -- a marker.
- "Add new user" form gets a "This is a service account" checkbox: swaps
  the person-shaped fields (first/last name, birthday, ToS agreement)
  for a single account-name field, since none of those make sense for a
  non-person account. On create, the route adds the user to
  app_sso_service_account.
- User.listDetail() annotates each user with isServiceAccount (checked
  against the marker group's member list once per call, not the memberof
  overlay's reverse attribute -- not reliably returned by every LDAP
  server this app might point at, confirmed against a real external
  directory during testing). Users page shows a "service" badge.
- Notification broadcasts (filter_type=all/all_active) exclude service
  accounts by default -- nobody reads mail as `stuff_manager`.
- Fixed a real, previously-unrelated bug this surfaced: addPosixAccount
  unconditionally set `mail: data.mail` in the LDAP entry even when
  undefined, and ldapts/slapd reject an attribute given an explicit
  undefined value ("no values for attribute type") rather than treating
  it as absent. This meant creating ANY user without an email already
  failed outright -- not something a service account (which commonly has
  no real mailbox) could route around. Made mail conditional, matching
  how mobile/sshPublicKey/dob already work.
- docs/ldap.md now explains both kinds of service account side by side
  and when to use which.

Verified end-to-end against a real external LDAP server (not a local
sandbox): created a service account with no email, confirmed it's
correctly flagged and excluded from broadcast recipient resolution,
confirmed a normal user is unaffected, confirmed the code degrades
gracefully if the marker group doesn't exist yet (pre-upgrade
deployments).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-15 20:52:50 -04:00
wmantly 0b701dfc6f Merge OAuth Apps + LDAP Info into one tabbed page; add Service Accounts
- OAuth Apps and LDAP Info are both "how do other apps/hosts plug into
  this SSO" concerns -- merged into a single /integrations page with
  tabs, replacing the two separate nav items with one. /oauth-clients
  and /ldap-info 301-redirect there for compat.
- Add a Service Accounts section under the LDAP tab: bind-only LDAP
  identities (organizationalRole + simpleSecurityObject, no
  posixAccount) for apps/hosts, as opposed to real people. Create,
  rotate password, and delete, all from the UI -- previously the only
  such account (theta-env's bootstrap-created cn=ldapclient) was
  invisible to the Users page entirely (filtered out by
  conf.ldap.userFilter) and had no GUI way to see or rotate it; the new
  ServiceAccount model uses the exact same objectClasses bootstrap.js
  already creates cn=ldapclient with, so it recognizes and manages that
  account too, not just ones created through this UI.
- The ldap-client bash snippet now points at "create one under Service
  Accounts above" instead of a bare textual example.

Verified against a real LDAP server (not just the dev sandbox's usual
unreachable one): created a service account, confirmed it binds
successfully with the generated password, rotated its password, and
deleted it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-15 19:57:32 -04:00
wmantly ed62e70678 Stop the notification Compose form from defaulting to "email everyone"
The Compose form's "Send to" radio group had "All active users" checked
by default with no confirmation before Send -- anyone opening the
Dashboard to see how the feature works, typing a test subject/message,
and clicking Send would broadcast to every active user. Remove the
default (a target must now be explicitly chosen) and require a confirm
step before actually sending to "all" or "all_active".

Also add a hard safety net in models/email.js: Mail.send is a no-op
under NODE_ENV=test, so the automated test suite (which exercises the
real notification/password-reset/invite/OTP-by-email routes with
NODE_ENV=test) can never deliver real mail regardless of what recipient
list a test resolves.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-15 17:02:57 -04:00
wmantly f45349e0cd Fix uid/gidNumber allocation crash, add a configurable id floor (#44)
Reported: creating any user via the API failed with

  {"name":"InvalidSyntaxError","message":"gidNumber: value #0 invalid per syntax Code: 0x15"}

Root cause: addPosixGroup() computes the next gidNumber as
`Math.max(...groups.map(i => i.gidNumber)) + 1`. theta-env's
bootstrap.js creates the first admin via raw ldapadd with a hardcoded
uidNumber/gidNumber (10000) directly on the user entry, but never
creates a matching posixGroup entry -- so on a theta-env-bootstrapped
directory there are zero posixGroup entries, `Math.max()` on an empty
array is `-Infinity` in JS (not 0), and `-Infinity + 1` stringifies to
"-Infinity" -- an invalid LDAP integer, rejected by the directory. This
broke every single user creation, not just this one.

Separately: the reporter's intended scheme is for organically-created
users to start at uidNumber/gidNumber 1500, distinct from the
bootstrap admin's reserved 10000. Fixing the crash with a bare "floor
of 1500" alone wouldn't achieve that, since addPosixAccount's own
Math.max() would still find the admin's posixAccount entry (uidNumber
10000, found via a different, correctly-indexed search) and allocate
10001 for the next user.

Added a shared nextPosixId(entries, key) helper: takes the highest
existing value strictly below conf.ldap.uidGidReservedFloor (default
9000) plus one, or conf.ldap.uidGidMin (default 1500) if there are no
such entries. Ids at/above the reserved floor -- like the bootstrap
admin's 10000 -- are ignored entirely when computing the next
available number, so real users always start at 1500 and grow upward
regardless of the admin's reserved id.

Verified against a real theta-env deployment end to end:
- Reproduced the exact reported crash on a fresh bootstrap
- After the fix: first real user gets uidNumber/gidNumber "1500",
  second gets "1501" -- admin's 10000 never enters the calculation
- New unit tests (nodejs/tests/posix_id.test.js, no LDAP required):
  6/6 pass, covering the empty-array case, the reserved-floor
  exclusion, and the NaN-from-missing-value case
- npm test: 18/18 passing tests still pass (unchanged); the other 155
  failures are pre-existing/environmental (no LDAP server in this
  sandbox) -- confirmed via git stash before starting this fix
2026-07-14 23:03:59 -04:00
wmantly b91ef2792d Add self-service API tokens (PATs) with UI + Bearer auth (#35)
Personal access tokens so scripts/CI can call the management API without a
browser session. Each logged-in user mints their own token; it authenticates as
the creator (carries their LDAP group permissions, re-resolved live), so the
existing permission.byGroup checks apply unchanged.

- models/api_token.js: new ApiToken model (sso_<id>_<secret> format; id is the
  lookup key, secret bcrypt-hashed + isPrivate, shown once). add()/rotate()/
  authenticate(); optional expires_at; best-effort last_used_on. No _ttl
  (persists; lifetime via expires_at).
- routes/api_token.js: self-service CRUD (list/get/update/delete/rotate),
  owner-scoped (created_by === req.user.uid, 403 otherwise).
- middleware/auth.js + models/auth.js: accept `Authorization: Bearer sso_...`
  (precedence over the auth-token session header); checkApiToken collapses
  every failure to one generic 401 (no existence/secret/expiry leak).
- views/api_tokens.ejs + routes/index.js (GET /api-tokens): self-service page
  (forceLogin, no group gate) — create (token shown once), edit, rotate, revoke.
- views/top.ejs: "API Tokens" nav entry visible to all logged-in users.
- public/js/app.js: app.apiToken client module.
- DEPLOYMENT.md + docs/deployment.md: API tokens section.

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 17:12:35 -04:00
wmantly bb79247054 oath grpup fixes 2026-07-02 16:49:22 -04:00
wmantly 5644bfa5ec Updated frontend 2026-07-01 11:10:09 -04:00
wmantly 24d5364da0 Corrected email address 2024-02-19 10:49:37 -05:00
wmantly 0e212c48cc added white lable name 2021-03-23 00:36:53 -04:00
wmantly cb51fae2f6 added group owners 2020-12-31 09:53:44 -05:00
wmantly 5143162510 Better error message failed removing user 2020-12-30 15:27:06 -05:00
wmantly adf073bab7 Forced user names to be lowercase. 2020-12-30 13:21:18 -05:00
wmantly b8f632e644 user edit 2020-05-15 15:17:57 -04:00
wmantly 0889832efc groups and reset 2020-05-15 00:40:15 -04:00
wmantly 4d51a4ac9e rc1 2020-05-05 23:07:00 -04:00
wmantly f2309463a4 beta 2020-05-03 18:28:11 -04:00
wmantly 8dc0e946b1 beta 2020-05-03 18:22:51 -04:00